<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NLP Parts as Desiring-Machines or Metaprograms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edwardewilson.com/2006/08/10/nlp-parts-as-desiring-machines-or-metaprograms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edwardewilson.com/2006/08/10/nlp-parts-as-desiring-machines-or-metaprograms/</link>
	<description>Reprogramming Your Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nxuhdn</title>
		<link>http://edwardewilson.com/2006/08/10/nlp-parts-as-desiring-machines-or-metaprograms/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nxuhdn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fenris23.wordpress.com/2006/08/10/nlp-parts-as-desiring-machines-or-metaprograms/#comment-1644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[V4Ac64  &lt;a href=&quot;http://fuzgvigqefdr.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fuzgvigqefdr&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V4Ac64  <a href="http://fuzgvigqefdr.com/" rel="nofollow">fuzgvigqefdr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemonkid</title>
		<link>http://edwardewilson.com/2006/08/10/nlp-parts-as-desiring-machines-or-metaprograms/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lemonkid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fenris23.wordpress.com/2006/08/10/nlp-parts-as-desiring-machines-or-metaprograms/#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To me NLP is more a psychological martial art because it deals largely in bio-chemical mechanics as related to thought and emotion. When we become conscious of this biological effects of thought and emotion we can tweak them as desired. NLP is basically a tool to hack your bio-mechanical programming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me NLP is more a psychological martial art because it deals largely in bio-chemical mechanics as related to thought and emotion. When we become conscious of this biological effects of thought and emotion we can tweak them as desired. NLP is basically a tool to hack your bio-mechanical programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Gray</title>
		<link>http://edwardewilson.com/2006/08/10/nlp-parts-as-desiring-machines-or-metaprograms/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fenris23.wordpress.com/2006/08/10/nlp-parts-as-desiring-machines-or-metaprograms/#comment-7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In NLP the idea of parts is a metaphor that allows a therapist to interact with subsystems which may or may not have reality in and of itself. Parts are established in an &quot;as if&quot; frame in order to work with a specific problem.   While useful, parts work has often been criticized for creating relatively artificial distinctions and reifying them in a way that can be less than useful to the individual.  Grinder and Bandler suggest that some cases of dissociative Identity disordy are iatrogenic, caused by the creation and consolidation of parts as minor personaloities.

In Jungian theory, the idea of a part is much more clearly established in terms of the autonomous complexes.  This seems to be the real deal and it parallels the NLP concept well. It may be the ultimate root of the NLP ocnept wich, as I recall, comes from the work of Virginia Satir.  Jung sees the compexes as accretions of experiential data about archetypal cores.  Contrary to the conventional view, the archetypes are b iological-level potentials for action and perception that become the center of parts devoted to certain kinds of affective experience.  

Each such complex is capable of becoming the center of the entire system and the whole operates in accordance with the pronciples of general systems theory.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In NLP the idea of parts is a metaphor that allows a therapist to interact with subsystems which may or may not have reality in and of itself. Parts are established in an &#8220;as if&#8221; frame in order to work with a specific problem.   While useful, parts work has often been criticized for creating relatively artificial distinctions and reifying them in a way that can be less than useful to the individual.  Grinder and Bandler suggest that some cases of dissociative Identity disordy are iatrogenic, caused by the creation and consolidation of parts as minor personaloities.</p>
<p>In Jungian theory, the idea of a part is much more clearly established in terms of the autonomous complexes.  This seems to be the real deal and it parallels the NLP concept well. It may be the ultimate root of the NLP ocnept wich, as I recall, comes from the work of Virginia Satir.  Jung sees the compexes as accretions of experiential data about archetypal cores.  Contrary to the conventional view, the archetypes are b iological-level potentials for action and perception that become the center of parts devoted to certain kinds of affective experience.  </p>
<p>Each such complex is capable of becoming the center of the entire system and the whole operates in accordance with the pronciples of general systems theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

